Dr. Alexandra F. Corning is a¬†Research Associate Professor at the University of Notre Dame, where she¬†researches eating disorders and body image problems. Specifically, her research focuses on adolescent girls and preventing the development of eating disorders and their related symptoms before they get out of control. Her research lab has been conducting interventions and working with the mothers of middle school aged girls, as well as looking into the social processes that contribute to eating disorders.
Jan Hoffman, a staff writer for the New York Times¬†who regularly reports on adolescents, picked up on Dr. Corning’s research into the¬†negative consequences of women and girls engaging in “fat talk,” and wrote about it for the New York Times here. With Dr. Corning’s permission, we’re republishing it here.
‘Fat Talk’ Compels but Carries a Cost
By Jan Hoffman
Over winter break, Carolyn Bates, a college senior, and a friend each picked out five pairs of jeans at a Gap store in Indianapolis and eagerly tried them on. But the growing silence in their separate fitting rooms was telling. At last, one friend called out, ‚ÄúDang it, these fit everywhere but my thighs! I wish my legs weren‚Äôt so huge.‚Äù The response: ‚ÄúMy pair is way too long. I need to be taller or skinnier!‚Äù
The young women slumped out of the store, feeling lousy.
This exchange is what psychological researchers call ‚Äúfat talk,‚Äù the body-denigrating conversation between girls and women. It‚Äôs a bonding ritual they describe as ‚Äúcontagious,‚Äù aggravating poor body image and even setting the stage for eating disorders. Some researchers have found that fat talk is so embedded among women that it often reflects not how the speaker actually feels about her body but how she is expected to feel about it.
And while research shows that most women neither enjoy nor admire fat talk, it compels them. In one study, 93 percent of college women admitted to engaging in it.
Alexandra F. Corning, a research associate professor in psychology at the University of Notre Dame, wondered whether a woman‚Äôs size would affect her likability when she engaged in fat talk. As an online experiment, Dr. Corning showed 139 undergraduates photos of two thin and two overweight women, each making either a positive or negative remark about her body.
Because of the stigma against heavier people, Dr. Corning expected that the most popular option would be a thin woman who made positive comments about her body. But she found that wasn‚Äôt the case.
The most likable woman chosen by the students was overweight and quoted as saying: ‚ÄúI know I‚Äôm not perfect, but I love the way I look. I know how to work with what I‚Äôve got, and that‚Äôs all that matters.‚Äù
The results were heartening, Dr. Corning said, a glimmer that nearly two decades of positive body-image campaigns may be taking hold.
But, she acknowledged, her experiment had limitations. ‚ÄúAre the students really liking these women the most? Or are they saying it because they think they should?‚Äù said Dr. Corning. ‚ÄúThey might like them more, but would they really want to hang out with them?‚Äù
Renee Engeln, who directs the Body and Media Lab at Northwestern University, cautioned that ‚Äúwe have complicated reactions to confident women in general, and particularly to women who are confident about their bodies. Women sometimes see them as arrogant.‚Äù
Fat talk has insinuated itself among men, too, Dr. Engeln added, though it is far less frequent than with women. In addition, men are more likely to place emphasis on different issues, like muscular bulk or being too thin, something women rarely fret about, she said.
But putting a stop to fat talk is difficult. Dr. Corning said, in part because it feels airless and scripted and seems to offer the responder no avenue to change the dynamic without threatening the relationship. She gave an example:
First friend: ‚ÄúI can‚Äôt believe I ate that brownie. I am so fat!‚Äù
Second friend: ‚ÄúYou must be joking ‚Äî you are so not fat. Just look at my thighs.‚Äù
The second friend‚Äôs reply, an ‚Äúempathetic‚Äù self-deprecating retort to maintain the friendship on equal standing, includes reflexive praise of the first friend‚Äôs body, supposedly feeding the first friend‚Äôs hungry cry for affirmation, Dr. Corning said. But to do so, the second friend has eviscerated herself, a toxic tear-down by comparison.
Dr. Corning said that to break the cycle, a person shouldn‚Äôt engage. But particularly for younger women, it‚Äôs hard to say something like, ‚ÄúHey, no negative self-talk!‚Äù or ‚ÄúWhy do we put ourselves down?‚Äù
Instead, for adolescents, she suggested, ‚ÄúKeep it light; it‚Äôs not a moment for major social activism. Teenagers can change the topic. They do it all the time.‚Äù
Ms. Bates, who recently graduated from Notre Dame, pointed out that ‚Äúwhen you focus on clothes and make it about your body, you‚Äôve put your friend in a position where she can‚Äôt say anything right. She can‚Äôt be honest, because it could come off as hurtful.‚Äù
That winter day, as she and her friend drove away from the Gap feeling so deflated, her friend said, ‚ÄúWe always get good clothes from that store, but their new pants just don‚Äôt ‚Äòget‚Äô us!‚Äù
It wasn‚Äôt that their bodies didn‚Äôt fit the clothes; the clothes didn‚Äôt fit their bodies.
Ever since, said Ms. Bates, when the friends try on clothes that don‚Äôt fit, their go-to remark has become, ‚ÄúThis doesn‚Äôt get me!‚Äù And, taking a cue from the positive-image primer, they leave it at that.
A version of this article appeared in print on 05/28/2013, on page D4 of the NewYork edition with the headline: ‚ÄòFat Talk‚Äô Carries a Cost.
For more information on Dr. Corning’s research, check out the University of Notre Dame’s Body Image and Eating Disorder Research.